Truman was the one who adopted a policy of containment. This (arguably) aggressive approach was what influenced America to get into wars such as the Korean War and other smaller conflicts. Meanwhile, Eisenhower was a bit less aggressive. Although his Secretary of State Dulles preached Brinksmanship and was very anti-Soviet, Eisenhower himself was somewhat against this, as shown when he did nothing to prevent the Hungarian Revolt. He also sought to increase U.S-Soviet Relations in the Spirit of Geneva, but the U-2 Incident pretty much erased most of his progress.
<span>It provided badly needed funds and naval support.</span>
The last one The iron Chancellor hope this helped
<span>The campaign Americans everywhere into talking about Mr.Carter's "Weakening performances, including doing nothing to achieve the release of Americans hostages held in Iran." Mr.Carter was diminishing defense spending at the same time the Soviets were building an estimated 13,500 tanks, 6,300 aircrafts, 900 ballistic missiles and 1200 intercontinental missiles</span>
Inspite that he wanted to end slavery he was really bias towards other peoples ideas
