Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If the ratio of dogs to cats is 49:28, as an actual ratio (fraction), this is

We can reduce that to make the numbers smaller without changing the ratio. reducing gives us

We will use that ratio now to set up a proportion that involves a given number of cats and an unknown number of dogs. Keeping dogs on top and cats on bottom,

Cross multiply to get
4x = 140 so
x = 35
According to the ratio of dogs to cats, if there are 20 cats, there will be 35 dogs.
2 root 5 is the simplified version
Answer:
Part a) The inequality that models this problem is 
Part b) The greatest possible value for the width is 10.6 centimeters
Step-by-step explanation:
Part a) Which inequality models this problem?
Let
l ----> the length of the rectangle in cm
w ---> the width of the rectangle in cm
we know that
The perimeter of the rectangle is equal to

Remember that
The term "at most" means "less than or equal to"
so
----> inequality A
---> equation B
substitute equation B in the inequality A
---> inequality that model the problem
Part b) what is the greatest possible value for the width?
solve for w


Divide by 10 both sides

therefore
The greatest possible value for the width is 10.6 centimeters
Answer:
G(7)= 4
Step-by-step explanation:
When looking at the graph, you can see that at x=7, y= 4 :)
Answer:
A. 92 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Please let me know if you want me to add an explanation as to why this is the answer/how I got this answer. I can definitely do that, I just wouldn’t want to write it if you don’t want me to :)