answer is b because you can see that it breaks the cycle
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
a)
<u>Day 1</u>
- 70 min for 10 km
- Rate = 70/10 = 7 min/km
<u>Day 10</u>
- 2h40 min for 20 km
- 2*60+40 = 160 min for 20 km
- Rate = 160/20 = 8 min/km
<u>Day 20</u>
- 4 h 15 min for 30 km
- 4*60 + 15 = 255 min for 30 km
- Rate = 255/30 = 8.5 min / km
b)
<u>From the rate change we see:</u>
- 1 min increase when the distance increases from 10 km to 20 km
- 0.5 min increase when distance increases from 20 km to 30 km
So we see 1 min increase per twice the distance increase
- With the same rate increase we can expect 1 min increase from 20 km to 40 km, which gives us the rate of 9 min/km
- With same logic we get 9.055 km/min rate for 44 km distance
<u>Total time it takes:</u>
- 9.055*44 = 398.42 min = 398.42*1/60 min = 6 h and 38.42 min
Answer:
3 not the right anwser
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
to compare she must calculate...
1) ((2*3)+2)/3 she get 2.666
2) ((2*7)+5)/7 she get 2.714
by approximation the two are the same and she had enough flour.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Compare and contrast oceanographers and geologists.