What is the decimal value of 3 quarters and 2 dimes?

Answer please eeeeeeee will give branliest

blondinia [14]

Answer:

p-3 is the correct answer

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. You are standing on top of a ridge using a clinometer trying to figure out how far your dog has wandered off in

olga_2 [115]

Given:

It is given that the ridge is 360 inches tall.

Assumptions:

Assume you are 170.1 cm tall which equals 67 inches tall, the height from your eye to the floor is $360+67 = 427$ inches.

The distance from your eye level to the bottom of the ridge is 427 inches.

Assume the angle A is 60°.

To find the distance from you to your dog.

Solution:

A right-angled triangle can be formed where the angle is 60°, the distance between you and the dog is the hypotenuse of the triangle and your height from the floor is the adjacent side of the triangle.

Assume the hypotenuse of the triangle measures x inches.

To determine the length of the hypotenuse, we determine the cos of the angle.

$cos \theta = \frac{adjacent side}{hypotenuse} .$

$cos A = \frac{427}{x} , x = \frac{427}{cos60} , cos60=0.5.$

$x=\frac{427}{0.5} = 854.$

So if the ridge is 360 inches tall and you are 67 inches tall and the angle A is 60°, the distance between your dog and you is 854 inches.

3 0

3 years ago

In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from

Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.0003214 -0.00034}{\sqrt{\frac{0.00034(1-0.00034)}{420095}}}=-0.654$

$p_v =2*P(Z$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.005$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the true proportion not differs significantly from the specified value of 0.00034 or 0.034%.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=420095 represent the random sample taken

X=135 represent the subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today)

$\hat p=\frac{135}{420095}=0.0003214$ estimated proportion of subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today)

$p_o=0.00034$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.005$ represent the significance level

Confidence=99.5% or 0.995

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of 0.0340% :

Null hypothesis: $p=0.00034$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.00034$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.0003214 -0.00034}{\sqrt{\frac{0.00034(1-0.00034)}{420095}}}=-0.654$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.005$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(Z$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.005$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the true proportion not differs significantly from the specified value of 0.00034 or 0.034%.

4 0

3 years ago

The price of a video game increases by 20%, then decreases by 10%. If the final price is $46.98,

Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

The original price was $43.50

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

x ----> the original price of a video game

we know that

1) The price of a video game increases by 20%

so