Replaced how? If you mean like the Roman empire, that would be incorrect. Both empires considered each other Roman and both empires considered themselves Roman. So when the west fell, the Byzantines did not 'replace' the western Romans in being Roman. Instead, they just kept on being Roman as their western counterparts fell. However, for a period, the Byzantines did manage to reconquer parts of the Western Empire and even Rome, but that was relatively short-lived. In that case, you could argue that the Byzantines sort of did replace the western Romans in being the Roman empire with Rome in its possession. However, that is a stretch in my opinion.
In short: False, the Eastern Romans did not replace the western Romans as they were both seen as Romans, just with different governments.
Answer:
Enslaved captures/losers of war
To sale of people to the new world
The first president of the United States was George Washington
Answer:
The comparison was made to show how cities are dependent on farms and that is why it is necessary to stimulate the work of farmers.
Explanation:
Bryan's speech was made to encourage a measure that would help farmers to carry out their duties. This measure sought to stimulate the minting of silver to gold in 16 to 1, which would increase the circulation of money and allow an increase in credit for agricultural production.
Bryan knew that this measure would be controversial, especially in large cities that they thought would be harmed. To debate this thought Bryan said: "Burn down your cities and leave our farms, and your cities will spring up again as if by magic. But destroy our farms and the grass will grow in the streets of every city in the country." By this he meant that it was the obligation of the cities to support the work of the farms, because the cities are dependent on the farms, but the farms are not dependent on the cities.
I believe it was 86 years.<span />