<span>That's an interesting question. Feudal Japan had a more formalized and ritualized kind of culture than feudal Europe did; elaborate rules of courtesy applied at all levels of society, whereas European peasants were pretty crude for the most part. In both societies there was a unifying religious principle, which in Europe was Christianity and the authority of the Church, and in Japan was shintoism and the authority of the Emperor. In both cases, a social hierarchy attempted, with considerable success, to control everyone's lives; everyone owed their fealty to someone, except for the kings in Europe or the Emperor in Japan, who didn't owe loyalty to anyone, since there was no higher authority (at least, not counting deities). Both societies had similar types of weaponry (European armor was considerably tougher) and skilled swordsmen were much to be feared and respected. In the lower classes, life was cheap. Neither society had any concept of human rights; only the nobility had rights.</span>
<span>Both dynasties used exams to select officials.
</span>
Developed countries rely on exports from developing economies. When developed countries purchasing power is impaired, it also affects the export based economies of the developing economies.
Government benefits provided to the needy, usually in the form of cash or vouchers.
Hey there!
Under the Albany Plan of Union, the American colonies would have been ruled by a grand council and a president general. American colonies handled domestic matters, so, they surely didn't really have extreme full power. Which makes it understandable that they would have to have two leaders, to make sure that all 13 colonies are being handled correctly in which they should correspond.
Your answer: a grand council and a president general
