Fallacy is the use of faulty arguments which are not valid and as such are <em>rendered untrue </em>because of the way they are presented in the argument. <em>Some fallacies look valid,</em> but are still fallacious because <em>they do not satisfy</em> an important logical premise.
As a result of this, we can see that there are various types of fallacy and they include:
- Fallacy of Hasty Generalisation
- Argumentum ad Baculum
- Argumentum ad Hominem
- Slippery Slope
For example, when we use Argumentum ad Baculum (appeal to force), we try to make use of force to silence a person who has made a very valid and logical argument.
For example, when you tell a person, "I will soon slap you if you do not close up your mouth" is an appeal to force or Argumentum ad Baculum
Please note that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview so that you would get a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about fallacy here:
brainly.com/question/20939336
Answer:
C. There is a sense of helplessness in dealing with the surrounding violence.
Explanation:
A. does not work because the author has made it clear that regardless of the precautions taken, abductions still occur.
B. The violence in Iraq is not being compared to that of neighboring countries. It is just Iraq's violence that is being focused on in the passage.
C. As with A, the author has made it clear that you can become abducted without a driver, with a driver, without bodyguards, and with bodyguards, so there is not much you can do but hope you are left alone, which is a feeling of helplessness. It can happen no matter what you do.
D. This is incorrect because it said in the passage that even with bodyguards you can be abducted.
when they are giving certain plots
