Answer:The results of the U.S. presidential election of 1876 were a mess. A Democratic candidate had emerged with the lead in the popular vote, but 19 electoral votes from four states were in dispute. In 1877, Congress convened to settle the election—and their solution proved to be the beginning of the end for Reconstruction in the south
The Congress´s power implied through the "necessary and proper clause", also known as the "elastic clause" is to pass any legislation relating to the "express powers" granted though the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton was the main supporter of this interpretation.
Answer: 1) Evidence obtained from an illegal search and seizure cannot be used in a trial.
Explanation: the exclusionary rule states that illegal evidence must be “excluded” from court.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The groups of invaders that made the most limited incursions in the Roman Empire were the Franks.
The Franks were one of the Germanic tribes that tried to incursion the Roman Empire territories. As it is said above, the Franks were not a tribe that repeatedly invaded the Roman Empire territory, but indeed had some incursions.
The Franks inhabited the territories of the Lower Rhine and some others lived next to the Ems River. They were known to be fierce warriors and determined people that invaded some other regions as was the case of modern-day Belgium and the North of France.
Answer:
The correct answer is C) Schenck v. the United States (1919)
Explanation:
The Schenck v. the United States (1919) case has great importance in the history of the country. Two activists, Elizabeth Baer and Charles Schenck were writing against the military draft.
They even distributed pamphlets discouraging people from joining the military and promoted a rebellion against forceful draft.
They were charged under the Espionage Act of 1917. In their defense, they stated how they were only practicing their right to free speech.
However, the Judge did not rule in their favour stating that a free speech is not protected under the first Amendment if it creates a 'clear and present danger'
