The author of the text that contains this quote appeals to the reader's sense of logic by quoting an authority/expert on the matter. Taking into consideration that expert's opinions, in argument, are as close to a fact as you can get without actually using a fact, this shows us how your best answer here is option B.
In Walden, Thoureau presents a lesson of wisdom about the best way to life as an individual and as a social being.
What would look like excentricity to most people, means to him a reflection about the capitalism and the advantages and disadvantages of urbanization and industrialization.
The trancendentalism defended the vality of the intuition, and individualism. So it fits with the thoughts of Thoureau about the industrialization and reflections about life, as it is possible to confirm in Walden when a question is frequently asked about what is really important to the basic needs for the modern man to have a good life. He defends that it is possible to have a good life with the minimum of material resources to provide whatever the spirit needs, such as reading, reflections about life and nature watching. On the other hand, he afirms that it is possible to have a good life without an excess of clothes, food or fancy houses.
Its gonna be b trust me i seen this before on my test
The perspective is 3rd person, as they use names instead of words such as “me, I, mine, etc.
The right answer is <span>4. Tear down the wall and get closer to his neighbor.
The speaker tries to persuade his neighbor to put the wall down, to no avail. He realizes that the two of them are related as human beings. He tries to communicate, but the wall is a symbol of silence and isolation. The speaker feels that building walls is unnatural. "</span>Something there is that doesn’t love a wall, <span>That wants it down."</span>
