The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include any reference, text, or further context. We do not know what is the topic of controversy.
However, by doing some research we can help you with the following.
If you are referring to the controversy between formal science vs. pseudoscience, then the issues or problems that tend to lead to such controversies are the lack of evidence used by pseudoscientists when trying to prove something.
True scholars and scientists know that the scientific method is the only way to validate a phenomenon. The results can be repeated one, two, and three times, and scientists had to validate the results every single time. Then, we can say that something has scientific support and validation.
On the contrary, pseudoscientists often times do not include validation, just opinions, and general comments based on their own perspectives.
Explanation:
hope it correct from google -The goal of England's 1584 expedition was not to establish a colony but to scout potential locations along the eastern seaboard for future settlement. The sailors found a potential site at Roanoke Island, a small land mass resting between the mainland and the Outer Banks.
Plato believed that concepts had a universal form, an ideal form, which leads to his idealistic philosophy. Aristotle believed that universal forms were not necessarily attached to each object or concept, and that each instance of an object or a concept had to be analyzed on its own.
Help ensure the economic stability of the new nation
