Federal court case that dealt with the formation of a federal bank and a series of individual banks. The case of McCulloch v. Maryland started through a series of important events that involved a number of laws. The following laws will allow you to understand what was going on with the McCulloch v. Maryland case.
In 1816, the United States Congress passed an Act that allowed Federal Banks to be located and to operate within individual states in the U.S. Two years later, in 1816, the state of Maryland passed an Act that placed all banks and financial institutions that operated in the state under the taxation model of Maryland. This law thus made banks and other financial institutions in the state, including all federal banks, to pay Maryland state tax. A year after the passing of this law, McCulloch v. Maryland was heard.
McCulloch v. Maryland: The Case Profile
The case of McCulloch v. Maryland was heard in 1819. The case was tried in the Supreme Court of the United States. Andrew McCulloch was the defendant in McCulloch v. Maryland. McCulloch was the appointed manager of the Federal Bank located in Baltimore, Maryland. McCulloch refused to pay the state tax imposed by Maryland; he believed that federal banks were not subject to state taxation.
In McCulloch v. Maryland, the state was the plaintiff. The state of Maryland believed that the federal bank should pay state taxes because they were operating on their land and using their resources.
McCulloch v. Maryland: The Verdict
The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant, Andrew McCulloch. The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant because the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution stated that the Federal Government was permitted to operate banks within individual states without paying taxes. The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland created a precedent; it led to a number of future decisions involving taxation issues and the federal government.
COMMENTS
2 comments
No related posts.
Share
RELATED ARTICLES
Roper v. Simmons
Thomas Jefferson
20% of HIV-Infected Youth were Unaware of Status
Alabama Forms
Alaska Forms
Arizona Forms
Arkansas Forms
California Forms
Colorado Forms
Connecticut Forms
District Of Columbia Forms
Delaware Forms
Florida Forms
Georgia Forms
Idaho Forms
Hawaii Forms
Illinois Forms
Indiana Forms
Iowa Forms
Kansas Forms
Kentucky Forms
Louisiana Forms
Maine Forms
Maryland Forms
Massachusetts Forms
Michigan Forms
Minnesota Forms
Mississippi Forms
Missouri Forms
Montana Forms
Nebraska Forms
Nevada Forms
New Hampshire Forms
New Jersey Forms
New Mexico Forms
New York Forms
North Carolina Forms
North Dakota Forms
Ohio Forms
Oklahoma Forms
Oregon Forms
Pennsylvania Forms
Rhode Island Forms
South Carolina Forms
South Dakota Forms
Tennessee Forms
Texas Forms
Utah Forms
Vermont Forms
Virginia Forms
Washington Forms
West Virginia Forms
Wisconsin Forms
Wyoming Forms
Alabama Codes & Statutes
Alaska Codes & Statutes
Arizona Codes & Statutes
Arkansas Codes & Statutes
California Codes & Statutes
Connecticut Codes & Statutes
Delaware Codes & Statutes
District of Columbia Codes & Statutes
Florida Codes & Statutes
Georgia Codes & Statutes
Hawaii Codes & Statutes
Idaho Codes & Statutes
Illinois Codes & Statutes
Indiana Codes & Statutes
Iowa Codes & Statutes
Kansas Codes & Statutes
Kentucky Codes & Statutes
Louisiana Codes & Statutes
Maine Codes & Statutes
Maryland Codes & Statutes
Massachusetts Codes & Statutes
Michigan Codes & Statutes
Minnesota Codes & Statutes
Mississippi Codes & Statutes
Missouri Codes & Statutes
Montana Codes & Statutes
Nebraska Codes & Statutes
Nevada Codes & Statutes
New Hampshire Codes & Statutes
New Jersey Codes & Statutes
New Mexico Codes & Statutes
New York Codes & Statutes
North Carolina Codes & Statutes
North Dakota Codes & Statutes
Ohio Codes & Statutes
Oklahoma Codes & Statutes
Oregon Codes & Statutes
Pennsylvania Codes & Statute
Neverrrrrrrrrrr heard of that beforeeeee
The Indus River is the correct answer.
Answer:
B. is the right choice.
Explanation:
The archeological site of Monteverde II in Chile dates back 14,800 years, according to scientists (there´s a broad consensus). The discovery of many objects belonging to the Pleistocene was in 1977 in an area called Región de Los Lagos.
