1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nasty-shy [4]
3 years ago
10

How is filling an appointed office different from filling an elected office?

History
1 answer:
Lady bird [3.3K]3 years ago
8 0
Appointed is selected by the company's president and elected is selected by it gives the management the power to choose
elected is elected by people by voting
You might be interested in
“Absolute power corrupts ____”
S_A_V [24]
¨Absolute power corrupts Absolutely. Always¨ don't really know the question so hope this helps.<span />
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did President Nixon develop a better relationship with the People's
Semenov [28]

Answer:

the answer is C, he played ping pong

Explanation:

i have already done this

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about Loyalists and the Revolutionary War is true?
Ira Lisetskai [31]
C. Loyalists promised to end slavery if african americans supported Britian in the war.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The concept of checks and balances was established by the authors of the Constitution (3 points)
sweet [91]

The correct answer is A) so that no single branch of the government would gain too much power.

<em>The concepts of checks and balances were established by the authors of the Constitution so that no single branch of the government would gain too much power.</em>

This concept is a valuable precept because with the checks and balances can prevent wrongdoings from the other parts of the government and the exercise of power is divided equally. In the United States, the Constitution acknowledges three branches: the executive, that in the presidency of the U.S., the legislative, that is the House of Representatives and the Senate, and finally, the Judiciary, that is the Supreme Court.

5 0
3 years ago
How should we evaluate a candidate's performance in a debate?
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

We must evaluate the performance of a candidate in a debate through the relevance and construction of his arguments and his oratory capacity.

Explanation:

The debate is a way of finding out about a certain topic, through the ability of two or more individuals to argue and speak.

With this, we can affirm that the best way to evaluate the performance of a candidate in a debate is through the construction of arguments and the supporting evidence, assessing whether the candidate presents relevant, true and proven information to build an effective argument. The oratorical capacity of the candidate is also important. This must always be calm, integral, fluent and with a good diction.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Much of the South was divided into large farms called
    11·2 answers
  • Does Lincoln think slavery should be expanded in the West?
    11·1 answer
  • Controversial flag that flew over Georgia from 1956-2001 due to the flag's prominent Confederate emblem.
    15·1 answer
  • What is the main responsibility of a party organization?
    15·2 answers
  • What happened when the British arrived at Concord?
    11·1 answer
  • What was a reason that the patriots were more willing to go to war with Britain than the loyalists
    14·1 answer
  • What was committees of correspondence
    13·1 answer
  • What was the role of Roman men in the Roman Republic?
    9·2 answers
  • Which factor was a result of the war of 1812? A. The people were upset at the government and started boycotting and protesting.
    12·1 answer
  • Explain how colonial leaders used the Boston Massacre to their advantage, and how the British actions in this period brought the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!