The correct answer would be option C: "feels slightly foolish about the events that occur", this due to the way the excerpt is written, since, it seems the author wanted to let the readers know that the narrator isn't stupid, so that they keep that in mind, when they read about a foolish thing said narrator did. If the narrator did something dumb, then option A and B would be discarded, as would option D.
Answer:
B. A comparison between a whirlpool and a black hole is being made.
Explanation:
In this text, the author explains how a whirlpool works. He uses the example of a fish in order to explain this mechanism to the reader. The author describes the way the fish would have to swim in order to resist the force of the whirlpool. The author then tells us that the mechanism the whirlpool uses is similar to that of a black hole. Therefore, the items being compared are a whirlpool and a black hole.
13 I think, I’m not sure though :)
Answer:
A Journey to the Centre of the Earth and is a classic science fiction novel by Jules Verne. It was first published in French in 1864, then reissued in 1867 in a revised and expanded edition. Professor Otto Lidenbrock is the tale's central figure, an eccentric German scientist who believes there are volcanic tubes that reach to the very center of the earth. He, his nephew Axel, and their Icelandic guide Hans rappel into Iceland's celebrated inactive volcano then contend with many dangers, including cave-ins, subpolar tornadoes, an underground ocean, and living prehistoric creatures from the Mesozoic and Cenozoic eras. (The 1867 revised edition inserted additional prehistoric material in Chaps. 37–39.) Eventually the three explorers are spewed back to the surface by an active volcano, Stromboli, in southern Italy.
Answer:
No, because evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible to impair credibility.
Explanation:
In this context, credibility is only attained by an oath sworn with lawfully certified objects or items representing the religious beliefs of the state and not necessarily the genuine or validity of the witness declaration with such religious object to swore against the declaration of truth in the court of law.
