3 years ago

Argue

1 answer:

5 0

Answer:

I would say that I stand between these two arguments. Many criminals have sadistic minds and do not care for what happens to them. Thus, to them it would not matter whether they get the death penalty or not. They would just see it as a way of 'fun' in their own minds. Also, many criminals could have their own ways of getting away the crimes that they have committed. It is successful because many fear death, unlike those with twisted minds. In the end, all minds are twisted are they not for committing murders or such? Overall, I think that it is acceptable for murder yet not for convincing people to not commit crimes.

You might be interested in

How did southern tenant farming differ from sharecropping as a system of labor?

aalyn [17]

Answer:

Sharecroppers rented land and could grow any crops they chose; tenant farmers owned small plots of land and grew exclusively cash crops. D. Sharecroppers worked land owned by a group of former slaves; tenant farmers worked for wages.

Explanation:

Hope this helps in some way :)

8 0

3 years ago

How did the signing of the Magna Carta affect the lives of ordinary townspeople of the 13th century?

Serhud [2]

The correct answer is
B) It limited the power of the king to tax them and granted people jury trials before punishment

8 0

3 years ago

In rural African villages, bartering is used as a means of trading goods. What type of economic system is bartering typically fo

Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer is D. Traditional.