Answer:
Not completely
Explanation:
I like that we now have an option to wear masks. People who want to can, and those who have breathing issues don't have to. Just because it's not required doesn't mean you can't.
The break down of traditional boundaries in the face of increasingly global financial and cultural trends.
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
The trade value was $1.1 trillion.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The sole reason behind the police keeping someone in custody is to protect for the mean time the suspect pending the time he or she is guilty.
Yes it is the right of the police, given to them by the law is protect the juveniles and make sure they are kept safe until the next date to appear in court, should in case it is a court case. This law is backed up by the law.
