Answer:
It was used to encourage support for Hitler by promoting racism.
Explanation:
You didn't give the illustration, but according to the options, the only that fits is the last one - It was used to encourage support for Hitler by promoting racism - because the others were impossible to be done during the Nazism dominance in Germany. I think that the idea behind the illustration was that Hitler was seen as a kind of savior, the German protector against races that were dangerous for any reason.
B is the answer*÷,;÷*$,,÷[×,× ksudknwkwhsbouwnw
I think the answer is <span>The Border Ruffians</span>
Answer:
D) judges are able to strike down any laws they feel are immoral.
Explanation:
None of these are truly correct.
Federal Judges, especially in the Supreme Court, are nominated by the President, but needs to be approved by the two houses of congress. They are also in court for life, unless they break the constitution. These Judges, while they have their own beliefs, are supposed to be "3rd party", however, evidently the judges will rule based on what they believe is right.
A) is not exactly right, because administrations can nominate judges when there is a vacant space, either from the death of a judge or the judge stepping down.
B) is incorrect, because the judges are supposed to rule based on how the law affects the constitutional rights of the citizens of the country. They neither have the obligation to vote Democratic nor Republican.
C) is incorrect, because they are only able to nominate workers who can help them by hiring them. They do not nominate anybody.
D) is technically incorrect, but is your best answer. They do not strike down laws that "they feel are immoral", but that they strike down laws that break the constitution in any shape or form.
~
