Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
The null and the alternative hypothesis can be well written as:
Given that:
n = 200
x = 135
Alpha ∝ = 0.05 level of significance
Then;
⇒ 
= 200 × 0.6 × (1 -0.6)
= 200 × 0.6 × 0.4
= 48 ≥ 10
The sample proportion 
= 0.675
The test statistics 
Z = 2.165
The P-value = P(Z > 2.165)
= 1 - P(Z < 2.165)
From the z tables
= 1 - 0.9848
= 0.0152
Reject the null hypothesis since P-Value is lesser than alpha. ( i.e. 0.0152 < 0.05).
Thus, there is enough evidence to conclude that the value of the population proportion is greater than 0.6
The answer is 90/91. 6 1/2 - 7/8 divided by 5 11/16. Turn 6 1/2 and 5 11/16 to an improper fraction. 6 1/2= 13/2. 5/11= 91/16. Then you have to get each fraction to have equal denominators. All of them can have a denominator of 16. So you times everything to get a denominator of 16. 13/2= 104/16. 7/8=14/16. 91/16 stays the same because the denominator is already 16. Next you subtract 104/16 and 14/16 and get 45/8.( because you need to put it in simplest form.) Lastly you divide 45/8 by 91/16 and get 90/91.
Answer: I got you if its not to late the answer is 2,3
Step-by-step explanation
anything above 2 is meaningful so first you would subtract 21.9 28.1 to get 3.7 its above 2 so that's one do the same for the rest anything above 2 is your answer or right at two really hope this helps
Answer:
20.94021
Step-by-step explanation:
mark me brainlist
Answer:
(-2,6)
Step-by-step explanation:
