Answer:
i would say D my bad if im wrong have a good day tho fr :)
5. Solon 3. Direct Democracy 2. Assembly 1. Sparta 4.Athens
Hope this helps!
Answer:
A. Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation.
Explanation:
Considering the claim stated in the question, hence, among the following options, the statement that could be used as evidence in support of the claim that "Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence." is option A "Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation."
This is because a CLOSE PROXIMITY between Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand means these countries or colonies have a good rapport with Great Britain. Therefore, it was easier to negotiate their independence instead of going to war (for example USA) or series of agitation and protest to get their independence (for example India)
I believe the answer is: A.Smith knew that the invisible hand of the market was not concerned with the health of the laborer.
The power of invisible hand in the market only care about the power of supply and demand which would determine who will obtain the most wealth. Even if the process could disregard the wellness of many people, as long as the demand is met, consumers wouldn't put too much thought on the laborers.
They had a better position to spread muslim rule and they had better access to the Mediterranean sea and trade.
