1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dusya [7]
3 years ago
14

It due today please help me ?

History
2 answers:
kobusy [5.1K]3 years ago
4 0

I would most definitely Disagree!

gregori [183]3 years ago
4 0

Given that the other answer disagrees, I will impart to you why we should agree with Jefferson's purchase of the Louisiana Territory.

There are a number of reasons, either forseeable, or hidden in the dark in our purchase of the Louisiana Territory, which by no means almost bankrupted our nation.

1) The US had been largely under the influence of the policy of expansionism, in which the subset of this was later known as the manifest destiny. The US had already overpopulated their original 13 colonies, and had started spilling westward, much to the displeasure of the Native American tribes, which were promised by the British government that the expansion westward would be reigned in. In buying the Louisiana Purchase, the US would in turn be able to accomplish their manifest destiny, as well as open millions of acres of land for people to settle on.

2) The Louisiana Territory Purchase actually helped strengthen US and French relationships, particularly with the Napoleon administration. These much needed funds were used to in turn by supplies for France's military, and the land was in turn given for the US to distribute their population through population density.

3) The Louisiana Territory opened up the US to a what is known as prairies, or semi-dry grasslands that gain adequate amounts of rainfall and sunlight that sustained farming, which in turn could be used to sustain the growing population.

4) The settlement of these lands in an early age actually allowed for even more people to move westward later on during the gold rush era, in which thousands of people were able to travel from one city to another before embarking on the journey to the unknown. If they did not buy the Louisiana Territory, they would have needed to sooner or later, or else risk war with France with thousands of US citizens trespassing the country. In turn, the purchase was a benefit for both countries.

So yes, President Jefferson's purchase of the Louisiana Territory was justified, and was an important step for the US to become what we know of it today.

You might be interested in
James monroe wanted to build on the growing patriotism by?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
It was the transportation infastructure
3 0
3 years ago
What did the Homestead strike show?
Kryger [21]

Answer:

Correct Answer would be: A) the government usually sided with business owners

Explanation: They where willing to use force to end strikes.  

7 0
3 years ago
Capitol Hill event!!!
Oksanka [162]
It probably would’ve been different. I don’t think that if it was black or Islamic protestors then the capitol would’ve been breached. If it had been then the police wouldn’t let them in but instead there would be shots and gas. It would’ve been way more violent.
8 0
3 years ago
robespierre, danton, and marat are associated with the attempt by the french revolutionary government to?
chubhunter [2.5K]

A- SUPPRESS DOMESTIC OPPOSITION TO THE REVOLUTION  

B- CHANGE FRANCE FROM AN ABSOLUTE TO A CONSTITUTION MONARCHY  

C- LEAD A CONSERVATIVE BY THE FRENCH EMIGRESS  

D- REMOVE NEPOLEAN

A is the answer

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Tonkin Gulf Resolution
Korolek [52]

Answer:

Hello,

The Tonkin Gulf Resolution <u>gave the president authority to take all necessary means to repel an armed attack against U.S. forces.</u>

Explanation:

This happened during the United States involvement in the Vietnam war.The Tonkin Gulf was a station in Vietnam that was fired by forces of Northern Vietnamese. In response to this attack, the president of the United States by then, Lyndon B. Johnson, asked the congress to allow more military action to be deployed in the Indochina war.The congress discussed and allowed the  president to employ measures of striking back if necessary and promote the maintenance of international peace and security in the region.

All the Best!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a secondary source? A. a source used by two people B. a source that is lesser known C. a source based on primary sources
    6·1 answer
  • Zachary taylor and winfield scott were both
    6·2 answers
  • \president george w. bush refused to turn over to congress records of vice president cheney's secret energy task force meetings.
    10·1 answer
  • Based on what you have read in the article, which quotation from Malala best reflects the viewpoint of her blog?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains why, during the 1800s, manufacturers resisted workers’ demands for higher wages and safer workplac
    6·2 answers
  • True or false - the crusades were the holy wars from control of jerusalem​
    6·1 answer
  • What did the french begin to do in 1795 that sparked tension between the untied states and france??
    15·1 answer
  • How was Declaration of Independence different from previous document prepared by colonists
    11·2 answers
  • How did technology influence manifest destiny?
    5·1 answer
  • Seth was Adam's third son; from the line of Seth came the chosen Hebrew nation and the promised seed.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!