1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artemon [7]
4 years ago
15

HELP WILL MARK BRAINLYEST IF YOU HELP ME!!!!!!!!

History
2 answers:
bekas [8.4K]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Even though modern geopolitical relationships are difficult in a hypothetical world war scenario the world would be divided into direct participants, indirect participants, and neutral countries. The U.S. Making use of all its alliances all over the world including, North-American countries, Latin countries, Israel, former Nato countries, South-east allies, and African allies.

Explanation:

The modern geopolitical organization of the world would separate the world countries into three groups. Direct participants, indirect participants, and neutral countries. However, I can't say right now who would participate directly or indirectly because the starting conflict could involve countries that have never participated in a single war. However, I can tell you which alliances would rise. The NATO members. The Southeast Asian countries. The Asian-American countries in the Nato alliance. the Chinese-North Korea alliance and their sympathizers in Asia and the middle east. The seven Arab states and their sympathizers. The Russian-former soviet alliance countries. The South-American alliance. The African alliance. The African-Chinese sympathizers, the Latin-American Russia alliance. The U.S. Would ally with the south-east Asian countries, the NorthAmerican alliance, nato, and the African alliance.

kobusy [5.1K]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

If WW3 were to happen it would remain as a conventional war without the use of WMDs. The major nuclear powers (US, UK, France, Russia, and China) will do whatever they can to ensure that nukes don’t get used.

At best, it will be a conventional war that has all the participants keep the scope of their military actions limited.

At worst, it goes nuclear and the map gets redrawn in a big way as many national governments cease to exist and their nations collapse. Fortunately we’re no longer capable of wiping ourselves out. A lot of people will die, but it won’t result in the extinction of humanity.

Wars start through any number of pathways: One world war happened through deliberate action, the other was a crisis that spun out of control. In the coming decades, a war might ignite accidentally, such as by two opposing warships trading paint near a reef not even marked on a nautical chart. Or it could slow burn and erupt as a reordering of the global system in the late 2020s.

Making either scenario more of a risk is that military planners and political leaders on all sides assume their side would be the one to win in a “short” and “sharp” fight, to use common phrases. It would be anything but.

A great power conflict would be quite different from the small wars of today that the U.S. has grow accustomed to and, in turn, others think reveal a new American weakness.

You might be interested in
Why was John Adams, a founding father of our young country, able to get these acts passed by Congress; knowing that they directl
Anna007 [38]

Answer:

At that time the Alien and Sedition Acts were passed the nation was practically in self-defense mode. Large groups of Europeans were moving to the U.S. to look for a better life. In 1798 which is when the Alien and Sedition Act was passed tensions with France were high and war was a vivid thought. So the government had to protect the nation and French immigrants were not being treated well by nativist or Americans who did not like foreigners and the French also did not support the government. So the law was used to suppress voices of immigrants but also to protect the nation from spies and war. So Congress saw the acts has necessary to prevent a greater evil.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the early 1800s, the U.S., Britain, Russia, and this European nation were disputing over the Oregon Territory:
zysi [14]

Answer:

Google it

Explanation:

it has answer

:)

7 0
3 years ago
Areason that the United States and its allies formed NATO was to
larisa86 [58]

Answer:

C. defend member nations against Communist attacks.

Explanation:

EDGE 2021

4 0
3 years ago
Help me !!! Please I need it by today!!!
mylen [45]

Answer:

sorry i need points

Explanation:

googo gaga

7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast capitalism and socialism
Natali [406]

Answer:

Explanation:

Socialism is an economic and political system under which the means of production are publicly owned. Production and consumer prices are controlled by the government to best meet the needs of the people.

Capitalism is an economic system under which the means of production are privately owned. Production and consumer prices are based on a free-market system of “supply and demand.”

Socialism is most often criticized for its provision of social services programs requiring high taxes that may decelerate economic growth.

Capitalism is most often criticized for its tendency to allow income inequality and stratification of socio-economic classes.

Socialist governments strive to eliminate economic inequality by tightly controlling businesses and distributing wealth through programs that benefit the poor, such as free education and healthcare. Capitalism, on the other hand, holds that private enterprise utilizes economic resources more efficiently than the government and that society benefits when the distribution of wealth is determined by a freely-operating market.

Capitalism Definition

Capitalism is an economic system under which private individuals own and control businesses, property, and capital—the “means of production.” The volume of goods and services produced is based on a system of “supply and demand,” which encourages businesses to manufacture quality products as efficiently and inexpensively as possible.

Socialism Definition

Socialism describes a variety of economic systems under which the means of production are owned equally by everyone in society. In some socialist economies, the democratically elected government owns and controls major businesses and industries. In other socialist economies, production is controlled by worker cooperatives. In a few others, individual ownership of enterprise and property is allowed, but with high taxes and government control.

Ownership and Income Equality

Capitalists argue that private ownership of property (land, businesses, goods, and wealth) is essential to ensuring the natural right of people to control their own affairs. Capitalists believe that because private-sector enterprise uses resources more efficiently than government, society is better off when the free market decides who profits and who does not. In addition, private ownership of property makes it possible for people to borrow and invest money, thus growing the economy.

Socialists, on the other hand, believe that property should be owned by everyone. They argue that capitalism’s private ownership allows a relatively few wealthy people to acquire most of the property. The resulting income inequality leaves those less well off at the mercy of the rich. Socialists believe that since income inequality hurts the entire society, the government should reduce it through programs that benefit the poor such as free education and healthcare and higher taxes on the wealthy.

Consumer Prices

Under capitalism, consumer prices are determined by free market forces. Socialists argue that this can enable businesses that have become monopolies to exploit their power by charging excessively higher prices than warranted by their production costs.

Efficiency and Innovation

The profit incentive of capitalism’s private ownership encourages businesses to be more efficient and innovative, enabling them to manufacture better products at lower costs. While businesses often fail under capitalism, these failures give rise to new, more efficient businesses through a process known as “creative destruction.”

Healthcare and Taxation

Socialists argue that governments have a moral responsibility to provide essential social services. They believe that universally needed services like healthcare, as a natural right, should be provided free to everyone by the government. To this end, hospitals and clinics in socialist countries are often owned and controlled by the government.

Capitalist and Socialist Countries Today

Today, there are few if any developed countries that are 100% capitalist or socialist. Indeed, the economies of most countries combine elements of socialism and capitalism.

In Norway, Sweden, and Denmark—generally considered socialist—the government provides healthcare, education, and pensions. However, private ownership of property creates a degree of income inequality. An average of 65% of each nation’s wealth is held by only 10% of the people—a characteristic of capitalism.

The economies of Cuba, China, Vietnam, Russia, and North Korea incorporate characteristics of both socialism and communism.

While countries such as Great Britain, France, and Ireland have strong socialist parties, and their governments provide many social support programs, most businesses are privately owned, making them essentially capitalist.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the strengths and weaknesses nixon brought to the presidency and their consequences brainly
    12·1 answer
  • During the Renaissance, a new intellectual movement known as humanism evolved. What was the significance of the humanist movemen
    5·2 answers
  • Which positive effect might the rules of chivalry have had on feudal society?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following was an immediate cause of the Panic of 1837?
    9·2 answers
  • Anybody please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • If you were a Colonist, which colony would you choose to live in? What issue would motivate you to live there? Social, Political
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following contributed to Venice's rise as a city-state in Italy? (1 point)
    11·2 answers
  • In witch way are the articles of confederation and the us constitution similar
    9·1 answer
  • Which Amendment has been violated?
    12·1 answer
  • Evaluate 14 – 3 • 4 ÷ 6. (1 point) 14 12 6 3
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!