'Provides nutrients to the ACL' is not a function of the meniscus.
The meniscus is a C-shaped piece of tough with rubbery cartilage that acts as a shock absorber between the shinbone and the thighbone. It can be torn if you suddenly twist your knee while bearing weight on it.
The function of meniscus include- they act as shock absorbers and stabilize the knee. The meniscus act to disperse the weight of the body and reduce friction during movement. The menisci increase stability for femorotibial articulation, absorb shock, provide lubrication and nutrients to the knee joint.
Thus, the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee receives its nutrition from a direct vascular supply, so the meniscus cannot provide nutrients to the ACL.
Hence, option B is correct.
To learn more about meniscus here:
brainly.com/question/28013459
#SPJ4
Paul baltes would say that tom is seeking his grandfather's <u>"wisdom".</u>
Wisdom is one of those characteristics hard to characterize—in light of the fact that it incorporates so much—however which individuals by and large perceive when they experience it. Furthermore, it is experienced most clearly in the domain of basic leadership. Psychologists have a tendency to concur that astuteness includes a joining of information, experience, and profound understanding that fuses resilience for the vulnerabilities of life and in addition its good and bad times. There's a consciousness of how things play out after some time, and it gives a feeling of adjust.
The protection of markets with excess labor refers to the erection of barriers to imports of products competing with local offerings in an effort to protect local jobs. This is found in the <u>"Arguments for Protectionism"</u> section.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Arguments for Protectionism were made to protect the national security value of the trade. The arguments for protectionism section comprise many protection measures. They are as follows:
i) Protection on markets with excess productive capacity
ii) Employment protection and protection of markets with excess labor
iii) Protection of consumers
iv) Infant industry arguments
v) National defense interests
Excess productive capacity in the markets can help in invoking the protection of local labor and preventing purchase from foreign countries.
I am going to give you my honest opinion. I believe our country is still fighting against discrimination against today's immigrants because of the president we have. Immigration should not be restricted because without some of the immigrants we have here in America, we'd be limited in what we know and have achieved. Say for example, if Christopher Columbus never immigrated from England, he wouldn't have found the New Land of America (not to say that he founded this land in the first place but that's just a general example). Ultimately, if you were Hispanic, African, Asian, or even from Canada, you should still have access to a freer country such as America, where rules are lessened and given less strictness. That's my opinion, what's yours?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
