Explanation:
<em><u>
In my opinion, these proverbial sayings are very accurate</u></em>, since we need emotionally to hold on to a hope or hold on to something very strong, such as our faith, to never tire or surrender, the more we physically wear down our personal strength and motivation or have our minds focused on a goal, it will give us strength.
I’ll give you all that I know
Censure.
Contested Senate Elections.
Declarations of War.
Expulsion.
Filibusters and Cloture.
Impeachment.
Investigations.
Nominations.
An air conditioner because the teacher is setting the temperature and air conditioners always makes the class cold.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
A command economy typically has:
- The demand and the supply controlled by the government.
- Prices that are artificially controlled.
- Resource allocation is determined by macroeconomic considerations, as opposed to those of small firms or business owners.
The most famous example was that of the former Soviet Union.
