The correct answer is A) It was a period of rapid economic and social transformation. Hope this helps.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
What best describes the reason for US involvement in Japan, Korea, and Vietnam was the permanent intent of the United States government to instill the foreign policy of containment during the Cold War years. During that time. the Soviet Union tried to spread Communism over different parts of the world, as was the case of Czechoslovakia, EastmGermany, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, North Korea, North Vietnam, and the Island of Cuba.
That is why the United States tried to impede the spread of Communism at all costs because it went against the economic and political interests. The US attempt to contain Communist influence in Asia and Southeast Asia.
During the Cold War years, the US and the Soviet Union competed in the arms race, the space race, and the spread/containment of Communism.
The correct answer is <span>C. promote Islamic scholarship in their territories.
This way, they can convert the citizens of the territory to Islam and gain new followers and believers. </span>
Answer:
Senate and President
Explanation:
The decision to adopt treaty provisions is made by a country's president and senate. This is because it is necessary to create policies for the provisions of these treaties to be implemented in a country. These policies are formulated through laws and regulations that are created, approved and established by the president and members of the senate.
For this reason, we can say that it is the president and the national senate that participated in the approval process of the cybercrime treaty.
Answer:
A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.
Explanation:
According to a different source, the rest of the question states:
<em>Which prediction can most likely be made based on this scenario?</em>
<em>A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.</em>
<em>B. Even if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, people would not vote for either person.</em>
<em>C. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would continue to vote for Smith.</em>
<em>D. Even if Senator Smith decided not to run for office again, many people would vote for him as a write-in candidate.</em>
The prediction that is most likely to happen is that, if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would vote for him. We know, based on the passage, that Senator Smith is not well-liked among voters, as he is not considered to be responsive to the needs of voters. Therefore, it is very possible that Senator Smith would find it difficult to compete with another candidate.
