Answer:
the nominal wage rate in 2005 and in 2006 is 15.98 and 16.61 respectively
Explanation:
The computation of the nominal wage rate in 2005 and in 2006 is shown below:
For the year 2005
= $8.18 × $195.3 ÷ 100
= 15.98
And, for the year 2006
= $8.24 × 201.60 ÷ 100
= 16.61
In this way it should be calculated
hence, the nominal wage rate in 2005 and in 2006 is 15.98 and 16.61 respectively
<span>The origin of the word integer dates back to the early 16th century. Back then, the word was used as an adjective meaning 'entire' or 'whole'. However, the word is composed of two Latin words 'in-' (expressing negation) and the root of 'tangere' (to touch) which were used separately ages before it came together we know it today.</span>
Answer:
Add $45 to the book balance.
Explanation:
This is a transposition error which is an example of error of original entry. A transposition error occurs when the figures are posted in the wrong order, while an error original entry occurs when a wrong amount is entered into the right account. This kind of error usually causes discrepancy between the bank balance and the book balance.
To correct this error in the question, we first find the difference between the right amount and the wrong amount as follows:
Difference = Right amount – Wrong amount = $272 - $227 = $45
Therefore, the difference of $45 will be added to the book balance to bring it into an agreement with the bank treatment as follows:
Bank correct treatment = $272
New book treatment = Wrong amount + Difference = $227 + $45 = $272
It can now be seen that both posting are now in agreement after the correction.
Answer:
3. Correctly ignored a sunk cost
Explanation:
Sunk costs refer to those costs which have been incurred in the past, which are non recoverable and which have no current or future benefits.
Sunk costs are considered as irrelevant for decision making process as they do not relate to current period and have no future implications. For example, research and development expenditure incurred in the past represents a sunk cost.
In the given case, the ticket for opera was already purchased for $100 which can now neither be recovered nor transferred. Thus this cost is irrelevant for decision making as expenditure has already been made. When Shen decided to go for a party instead of the concert, Shen has correctly ignored a sunk cost.
The answer is A "Colonial merchants once nailed advertisements on posts in front of their stores." please marl me as brainliest
