1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ugo [173]
2 years ago
13

The Three-Fifths Compromise counted "Indians" as 3/5 of a person? O True OFalse

History
2 answers:
just olya [345]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

False. It was slaves. Technically, slaves weren't counted as 3/5 of a person either, it was just that 3 out of every 5 slaves were counted as a part of population in a slaveholding state for congressional representation.

Romashka [77]2 years ago
4 0
False

Under the compromise, every ENSLAVED American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.
Basically referring to the slaves in the the south so the south could have more representation.
You might be interested in
What was a result of the arms race between the United States and Soviet
yaroslaw [1]

Answer:

Added to this was the simple fact that, in the arms race, the United States had the much stronger economy. Part of the logic of proceeding with SDI was that, eventually, the arms race would cripple the Soviet economy.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Think about what you know of the situation in Europe in the early 1900s.
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer: A, B, & D

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Carter's foreign policy brought successes with the Camp David Accords and a return of the Canal Zone to Panamanian con
Talja [164]

His most challenging and unresolved problem was the takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, Iran in 1978 by Islamic fundamentalists and the taking of more than 40 American hostages. Carter was unable to secure their release during his presidency. The were released once Ronald Reagan took office.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What agreement attempted to address a crisis over slavery?
Veronika [31]

Answer:

think so the first one will be the ans

5 0
2 years ago
23. How did the English Bill of Rights change the British monarchy?
Lerok [7]
I believe the it is the second answer. New rights were created to protect individuals.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were mikhail gorbabachevs main reforms
    6·1 answer
  • 5. When did Russia stop allowing Western literature to be sold in the Soviet zone?
    5·1 answer
  • Some states allow same-day registration, while others do not. Which statement best describes the table?
    14·2 answers
  • What was a domestic policy goal for Jimmy Carter during his presidential bid in 1976?
    8·2 answers
  • What is the difference between gulags & kulaks
    15·1 answer
  • What is happening in the cartoon?
    7·2 answers
  • Economists can use new technology to
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the French and Indian War?
    7·1 answer
  • Whats is the theme in ben franklin's big splash​
    14·1 answer
  • #4 This allowed the Southern States to argue that "they didn't want to be
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!