Answer:
if(revenue.cents - expenses.cents < 0){
profit.dollars = revenue.dollars - expenses.dollars - 1;
profit.cents = 1 - revenue.cents - expenses.cents;
}
else{
profit.dollars = revenue.dollars - expenses.dollars;
profit.cents = revenue.cents - expenses.cents;
}
Explanation:
We know that profit is given as: revenue - expenses from the question.
From the given expression above;
if(revenue.cents - expenses.cents < 0)
then profit.dollar will be revenue.dollars - expenses.dollars - 1; the 1 is to be carry over to the cent part. And the profit.cent will be 1 - revenue.cents - expenses.cents;
else the profit.dollars and the profit.cent is computed directly without needing to carry over:
profit.dollars = revenue.dollars - expenses.dollars;
profit.cents = revenue.cents - expenses.cents;
Answer:
0 times because front is not clear
Answer:
I believe the answer is B. Puede
Answer and Explanation:
I believe its A. Modularity enables multiple programmers to work on a program at the same time..
Let me know if I'm wrong..
Answer:
The answer is "Option d"
Explanation:
The wardrobe engineering consists of choosing clothes that are so simple in design and better in the style that they are acceptable to the existing show-up and perfect for the future years. This design Originally coined Dressing for Confidence author John Molloy, which describe that clothes and accessories can also be used to create a certain picture, and wrong choices can be described as follows:
- In option a, It's right, that we know about current fashions, but selecting suitable career apparel is not important, that's why it is incorrect.
- In option b, It is wrong because whatever you wear is not to make choices of any sort.
- In option c, It is wrong because it can't provide promotion.
