1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
3 years ago
10

What according to Rosa Luxemburg were the consequences of European Social Democrat’s failure to block their nations’ government

going to war in 1914.
History
1 answer:
Murljashka [212]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Rosa Luxemburg wrote in The Junius Pamphlet (1915) that the Social Democrats across Europe failed to block their nation's governments because they were docile and showed weakness, there was a waning of their fighting spirit.

Explanation:

Rosa Luxemburg (1871-1919), a prominent Marxist intellectual in Germany said that the Social Democrats failed to stop the governments of Europe from going to war, especially because the Marxist leaders had lost their fighting spirit (Luxemburg, Julius Pamphlet, 1915). The consequence is that the bourgeois state and the dominant classes were able to maintain their control of the state and institutions at the expense of the people of Europe who had to endure the war. Luxemburg said the European Left should see the war as a test of strength and that the Social Democrats need to learn how to be protagonists instead of a  "will-less football," (Chapter 1, The Julius Pamphlet). Luxemburg believed the party needed to take control of their own fate and history if their view of society was to prevail. It is known through other speeches and writing that Luxemburg believed the Social Democrats had become overly bureaucratized and the trade unions in Germany resisted the idea of revolution.  

You might be interested in
FIRST TO ANSWER CORRECTLY WILL GET 40 POINTS!!!
Nady [450]
The idea of the social contract theory comes from Jean Jacques Rousseau's book the Social Contract but one of the most prominent philosophers that discussed the idea was Thomas Hobbes who describes social contract as a contract between the individuals and the government, whose authority comes from the people. The people would cede some of their rights to the government for protection and the sovereign is bound by the wishes of the people as it is they that govern his decisions.

So the question of John Stuart Mill relate to the theory of the social contract very much. The main issue is exactly how many rights would the people have to cede and what would be the right balance between the independence and the obedience to the social contract. That is a very thin and tricky line to navigate.
7 0
3 years ago
According to the passage, how does it seem that the Natives are responding to the Europeans arrival? *A great many years ago whe
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

they wanted freedom. peace, and love

Explanation:

all we need is someone to live in a very big house on the sea,

5 0
3 years ago
Select the explorers who determined that the Mississippi was not the desired waterway across America.
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

You're looking for Joliet and Marquette

4 0
3 years ago
How can reformers have an impact or create a positive change for their group? For example, how do you get the government to list
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

There's no “legal age” you have to reach to exercise your First Amendment freedoms.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Can you please help me with all of this
RUDIKE [14]

Genghis Khan was a leader with lot of great qualities, and he is regarded as a great leader, one of the greatest in history in fact.

Explanation:

Genghis Khan was a Mongol ruler of the Mongol Empire. He managed to unite the Mongol tribes and make them the greatest power of their time. Genghis Khan also set the foundations for the formation of the largest empire that the world has seen until then, only to be surpassed in size by the British Empire few centuries later.

This Mongol ruler possessed many great qualities. He was very wise, excellent tactician, loved his people, was establishing peace on the conquered territories, encouraged people of ethnic and religious backgrounds to collaborate and coexist. It is very interesting that Genghis Khan can be seen bot as a nationalist and as a liberal, from modern perspective of course.

His nationalist tendencies are seen in the fact that he loved his country, he loved his people, and he made sure that every Mongol has all of the basic needs for life secured. On the other side, his liberalism can be seen in the fact that he had nothing against people of other ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, but instead he was encouraging all people to put their differences aside, collaborate, and help each other for the benefit of everyone. All in all, Genghis Khan was an excellent leader, and a model as to how many other leaders should have been in that period of time.

Learn more about the Mongol Empire brainly.com/question/11288396

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the soviet union want to prevent a united west berlin?
    14·2 answers
  • When the temperature of the environment changes, the body temperature of a reptile? (1 point) A. Changes. B. Stays the same. C.
    15·1 answer
  • How did the fighting in Iwo Jima and Okinawa affect the Allies' Pacific strategy?
    8·2 answers
  • Andrew johnson, bill clinton, and richard nixon have all been impeached. true or false
    13·1 answer
  • Which statment about political action committee is true
    12·1 answer
  • Help ASAP. 60 pionts.
    8·1 answer
  • pls it's a product What idea regarding states' rights did the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions support
    12·1 answer
  • 9. Which state is called first for President Trump?
    11·2 answers
  • Los sucesos importantes del periodo del porfiriato y su fecha<br>​
    9·1 answer
  • Hello everyone in what country did you come from?​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!