Answer:
<h3>The Anglo ideal would disappear.</h3>
Explanation:
After World War I, nativists groups in U.S started to fear that if European ethnic groups continued to immigrate to the United States after, their anglo ideal and culture would disappear.
With increase in immigration from Europe after the end the World War I, the native-born Americans of European lineage felt threatened with the multiplicity of European languages, cultures, and religions increasing in the U.S.
In order to preserve their own culture and language, the nativists started numerous protests for new immigration policies. Subsequently,the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921 was introduced. For the first time, it put certain restrictions on European immigration in U.S.
The National Origins Act of 1924 was further introduced to restrict southern and eastern European immigrants. The political unrest in Russia after the end of the first World War led many eastern Europeans to migrate to U.S and other countries.
Answer:
Let us assume that Jimmy Carter is an intelligent, decent, hardworking man. Assume, moreover, that he has appointed to his cabinet and sub-cabinet many men and women who are experienced and dedicated. How, then, can a president—certainly no less mentally alert than most past presidents—with many advisers of high caliber, produce such an undistinguished presidency?
It’s a puzzlement. And it cannot be accounted for by most of the explanations currently in vogue, such as: Carter’s an outsider who really doesn’t understand the levers of national governance; or Carter surrounds himself with a “Georgia Mafia” whose weaknesses are the same as his own; or Carter is a bad manager who hasn’t been able to sort out decisions that a president must make from those that should be settled at lower levels; or Congress is so uncontrollable that it will not allow any president to exercise the reins of leadership; or the bureaucracy has grown beyond the span of presidential control; or many of the nation’s problem’s are highly intractable; or even all these reasons taken together—although there is truth in all.
I would like to put forward another theory: The root of the problem is that Jimmy Carter is the first Process President in American history.
“Process President”—using a definition by Aaron Wildavsky and Jack Knott—means that Carter places “greater emphasis on methods, procedures and instruments for making policy than on the content of policy itself.”
Carter is an activist. He wants to do things. Yet his campaign statements should have warned us that save for the human rights thrust in foreign policy, his passion in government is for how things are done, rather than what should be done.
He believes that if the process is good the product will be good. In other words, if he sets up a procedure for making policy that is open, comprehensive (his favorite word), and involves good people, whatever comes out of this pipeline will be acceptable (within certain budgetary limits).
Explanation:
This is false. The country where it was strongest was France. French aristocracy was so powerful and wealthy that it caused the French revolution in the 18th century, which marked the fall of Feudalism.
1. B. The adventures of a Legendary Hero
2. C. Dr. Gupta thought of his assistant and immediately called for him.
3. A. To Fuel
Hope that Helped
