Answer:
d). the current home nominal interest rate exceeds the current foreign nominal interest rate.
Explanation:
International Fisher Effect
It is a hypothesis in economy and finance which states that the great difference between the two countries currencies exchange rate is almost equal to the difference in the nominal rates of the two countries.
Currency appreciation means the value of one currency increases when compared to other country's currency.
Thus according to this theory, the value of the foreign currency increases when the current nominal interest rate of the home country is more than the current nominal interest rate of the foreign country.
Hence the answer is ---
d). the current home nominal interest rate exceeds the current foreign nominal interest rate.
Answer:
No, because marriage is a public and not a private fact.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Alice who was briefly married at the age of 16. She is now 28 years old and plans to marry Henry in the spring. Henry's sister found out about Alice's first marriage and then told Henry's parents. Alice now wants to sue Henry's sister for public disclosure of private facts. In this case, Alice does not have a case against Henry's sister because marriage is considered a public and not not considered a private fact. Private facts can be regarded ones personal details which has not been disclosed in the public domain. These could be private romantic encounter or someone sexual orientation. Immediately this personal details get disclosed publicly by the person, it is considered as "public fact" because it has moved into the public domain. Public disclosure of fact is passing across of fact-at-issue on to public, so that the fact can public knowledge.
The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:
a. regression toward the mean
b. groupthink
c. group polarization
d. social loafing
<span>e. rationalization
I believe the correct answer is option D. </span><span>The condition that often develops in large groups when tasks are neglected, because it is impossible for any one person to receive credit (or blame), is called social loafing.
</span>
Considering the situation described involving Dr. Miller, a professor at Western University, this may be <u>Effective</u>, but it is not <u>Efficient</u>.
This is because an action is considered <u>Effective</u> when it performs the expected or desired result. Thus, in this case, doing one-on-one tutoring to all of her accounting students would be <u>effective</u> because students would understand the lectures better that way.
However, such an approach is not <u>Efficient</u> because an action is considered <u>efficient</u> when maximum results with minimum effort or resources.
In this case, one-on-one tutoring would require Dr. Miller to spend so much time and energy. Thus, not <u>efficient</u>.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>Effective</u> and <u>Efficient</u>, respectively.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20776999
Answer:
A, U. S.dropped two atomic bombs on Japan. Specifically Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Explanation: