Answer:
C) Illusory
Explanation:
More than an illusory contract (which means an unreasonable and non-enforceable contract), this is an unconscionable contract that no court would enforce.
This contract is so one sided that it damages the other party. The duties in clued in this contact are not enforceable because no person should be forced to do all those things just because the other party has more bargaining power.
Out of the 5 possible options the illusory contract is the only possible choice. Illusory contracts are also non-enforceable since only one side provides real consideration.
1 is social meadia 2 is advertising and 3 is publicity
Answer: Market survey
Explanation:
One of the ways to determine what customers want is my doing s survey. A survey would guide you through what they want. One of the ways to do this survey to get accurate answers is through questionnaire's, questionnaire's could be sent through mobile or advert or mails, asking what exactly what the customers want, from the feedback, the owner can predict accurately.
Answer:
Quota rent
Explanation:
When voluntary export restraints (VER) are set up and / or import quotas are enforced, the extra profit that domestic producers make because the supply is artificially limited is called quota rent. Quota rents are a type of economic inefficiency since they produce more losses than benefits. Society as a whole generally losses while a group of favored companies make huge profits.
For example, sugar imports are limited in the US, so domestic sugar producers are able to sell sugar at much higher prices than regular international prices. That artificial extra profit earned by sugar companies in the US can be classified as quota rent.
Answer:
-21%
Explanation:
Initial share price = $50
Share price after 1 year = $46
net return = (200 x $46) - $10,000 - ($5,000 x 5%) = $9,200 - $10,000 - $250 = -$1,050
rate of return of margined position = -$1,050 / $5,000 = -0.21 = -21%
when you operate on the margin, your earnings can increase or decrease dramatically. In this case, an 8% price decrease resulted in a 215 lose.
