The answer to the question above is "C) Precedent" which is the kind of reasoning that Justice Fortas uses to support his argument when he refers to Keyishian v Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v Des Moines<span>. The precedent is the kind of reasoning which a person uses by using legal aspect support. Abe Fortas is a man with a law background. Thus, precedent is the most likely kind of reasoning he uses.</span>
After I mowed the lawn, I took a dip in my friend's pool.
** Introductory clauses are followed by a comma.
The first one: quickly is an adverb.
The second one: around
The third one: moped is a verb
The fourth one: is the same one as the second one. hope this helps :)
