Answer:
1 hour and 10 minutes = 60+10 = 70 minutes for 4 miles then divide 70 by 4 = 17.5 minutes for a mile
The War on Poverty was the name given to legislation introduced by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964. The legislation intended to deal with the problem of poverty across the country. This legislation was also influenced by the previous "New Deal" introduced by President Roosevelt. The legislation influenced how welfare was seen during the following decades, until the presidency of Bill Clinton, when he introduced the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996, reducing federal aid to impoverished people.
Answer:
What led to the outbreak of the bloodiest conflict in the history of North America? A common explanation is that the Civil War was fought over the moral issue of slavery. In fact, it was the economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict.
Explanation:
Same i need that answer someone please help
According to Jefferson himself, you could divide man in two kinds:
1) Those who did not trust people or feared them. Those people, supposedly, wished to prevent them from having powers by giving that power to a specific class that would hold the responsibility of watching over the people and the nation.
2) Those who are confident in the people and their individual liberties and consider them mostly honest and good people. In that case, there would be no need to give great powers to a higher class. In fact, that would be counterproductive to their ideals.
You will find those two lines of thinking in pretty much every country and every culture. They are considered often as Left or Right, Progressive or Conservative, Liberal or Socialist and so on.
That showed up quickly in the USA since when the Whigs party emerged, it did as opposition to the Democrat Party. Showing an early duality from the beginning of the American Democracy. And even if you have a multiparty system like other countries, you can easily find them dividing generally in two sides that internally agree with MOST issues but disagree fundamentally in many with the opposition.
