1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mekhanik [1.2K]
3 years ago
15

What is the disinhibition effect? What are the implications for this in terms of our interactions in cyberspace?

Law
1 answer:
Yanka [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

it is the lack of restraint one feels when communicating online in comparison to communicating in-person.

Explanation:

Barry Wellman, Professor of Sociology at the University of Toronto, heads Netlab at the Centre for Urban and Community Studies in the Department of Sociology, University of Toronto.

You might be interested in
If you are deaf and communicate with sign language:
sveta [45]

Answer:

You may bring an interpreter with you to knowledge and/or road test

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
____ states provide a qualified privilege for letters of recommendation.
stepan [7]
The answer is,

D. Nearly All
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the selections below was a belief of the Founding Fathers that mirrored John Locke's idea of the social contract?
zhannawk [14.2K]
It was a human being that lived on our solar system
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 13
ivanzaharov [21]

If I remember correctly, your license gets revoked for 30 days

7 0
3 years ago
which of the following terms represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk t
enyata [817]

Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.

A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.

Learn more about Proximate cause, here

brainly.com/question/13885854

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • From the driver's point of view, the driver is watching a boy walk through a crosswalk on the street where the driver wants to m
    6·1 answer
  • What is article 12 in the UAE law book?
    9·2 answers
  • What U.S. economic measurement “shrank” from $21.4 trillion in 2019 to $20.9 trillion in 2020 as a result of the coronavirus pan
    9·1 answer
  • The bread soaks up the juices and flavours .​
    6·2 answers
  • What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?
    6·2 answers
  • ZTSHR says lol okkkkkkk
    8·2 answers
  • Suppose a person was at fault in an auto accident causing $75,000 in property damage With a policy including liability limits of
    12·1 answer
  • What law states that by choosing to operate a motor vehicle you are agreeing to a chemical test upon request?.
    15·1 answer
  • what does research state about the effectiveness of appointed counsel verse privately funded counsel?
    12·1 answer
  • For what reason were the alien and sedition acts unpopular with most americans?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!