Answer:
In a 7-2 choice, the Supreme Court's larger part ruled that not one or the other understudies nor instructors “shed their sacred rights to opportunity of discourse or expression at the school building gate.” The Court took the position that school authorities seem not deny as it were on the doubt that the discourse might disturb the learning
Explanation:
Answer:
the contributory negligence claim,
Explanation:
''If the defendant is able to prove the contributory negligence claim, the plaintiff may be totally barred from recovering damages or her damages may be reduced to reflect her role in the resulting injury. ''
Answer:
an order to compel and impose sanctions for noncompliance
Explanation:
:)
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
I think it’s necessary because it sets boundaries and keeps people safe. Some people don’t follow them, but when/if they get caught they have to serve a punishment as the effect of what they did. Sometimes people whose jobs have power think that the power belongs to them too, which makes them think they are above the law, but they’re not. People do accept them and if there is a wrong or stupid law, especially now-a-days people will go on social media and speak their opinions. (Hope this was helpful!)
