Answer:
Yes. Under the doctrine of equitable estoppel, when a person relies on an owner's oral promise to sell real property and then changes his or her position substantially, the owner is bound by the oral promise.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Since the woman didn't mean to, the best explanation would be an accident. Hope i helped and have a wonderful day! :)))
Answer: sociological
Explanation:
This is because the society influences the public the most due to peer group
Answer:
D.A court may refuse to enforce an unconscionable contract as contrary to public policy.
Explanation:
An unconscionable contract is a contract that is extremely one-sided. In this type of contracts, one of the parties has no real choice to not participate. This is most often a consequence of the power and bargaining differences between the parties. When a court finds that a contract is unconscionable, they might declare it to be contrary to public policy. They might determine that the parties are to be released from their contract obligations.