One of the core values of Friedrich Nietzsche is that
- there has been a moral crusade to eliminate desires
Friedrich Nietzsche is a German philosopher that was born in 1844 and died in 1900. He was averse to the concept of morality.
He believed that when humans formulate concepts on morality, they limit themselves from experiencing and being their true nature.
He proposed that most of these ideals were simply invented by man and were not absolute. For example, he mentioned that the belief in God was limiting because people will be restricted from doing certain things.
When you fear punishment from a higher being, you may not want to do things you normally would.
Conclusively, we can deduce that Nietzsche believed that there is a moral crusade to eliminate desires.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/21243429
There is extraneous information in the diagram. There is duplicate information where you have... There are rivers flowing beneath our feet... a myth? Can stay because it’s simplified. The information ...Have you ever heard that there are rivers of water flowing underground? Do you think it’s true? should be deleted because it’s duplicating the simplified statement prior. Also, Some rivers, such as the Alpaha River in northern Florida, USA,can disappear underground during low flow periods isn’t relevant to the rest of the diagram. Generally water underground is more like water in a sponge is inaccurate and should be deleted. It states in the diagram later on that the water underground is a filler between the rock particles and soil. I hope this helped you. Sorry I didn’t see it sooner.
Answer:
Commentary is the most important part of the perfect paragraph because it what allows the reader to understand more about what is being said. For example a commentary may also draw attention to current advances and speculate on future directions of a certain topic, and may include original data as well as state a personal opinion.
Explanation:
Answer:
but I fell on the side walk and broke my arm
Explanation:
The error in this sentence is a A) pronoun-antecedent voice agreement error. But it should be noted that this has become more standard usage in common dialogue.
