Translation of the question: 1) what would happen if in Colombia exist only one region? 2) would it be good for democracy that a single party governs?
Colombia, as well as many South American and worldwide countries, function under the model of a democratic federation, where each department ( named in other countries as states, provinces, etc.) have sovereignty and are all gathered by a federal government that unifies them into a nation. Each region of any country and Colombia is not the exception, has their particularities, some of them are richer and more developed than others, some are wealthier, while others are poor.
The idea of a unification though, desirable in theory, do not allow these regions to express their particularities in culture, ethnic, economic and sociopolitical manners or beliefs, therefore sharing the common through the federation, but their peculiarities through the differentiation of several departments of regions allow social and political stability to be possible.
For the same reason, in terms of democratic government, different voices (and different ways of thinking) are necessary to include in a balanced manner all their political preferences, having in mind that in a democracy ( the govern by the people) none exerts absolute control, and no one imposes all their beliefs over the other, but establishes agreements among the different parties to satisfy the needs of the country, looking at common interest on behalf of the state. The hegemony of a single party is as harmful as a totality govern. An excellent example of this is Mexico, where for 70 years an only party ruled the institutional revolutionary party (PRI) which caused the lack of counterbalance in the policy and segregation of opposition to the regime.
Answer:
Hiện nay, trong các báo cáo nghiên cứu dư luận xã hội, thường xuất hiện các cụm từ như: “dư luận cho rằng; một số ý kiến cho rằng; nhiều ý kiến cho rằng
Explanation:
One illustration of general intent is the presumption that a person intended the predictable outcomes of their criminal act.
The term "general intent" describes the criminal's attitude at the time the crime was committed. Even if the perpetrator is unaware that the act is illegal, all that is necessary for a crime to be committed with general intent is the perpetrator's intention to commit the crime. It is not necessary for a general intent crime to have a specific harm in mind when it is being committed. Beyond the willingness to commit the crime, general intent crimes do not call for any additional mental states (crime).
Learn more about criminal act brainly.com/question/12372677
#SPJ4
Answer:
B
Explanation:
how are ancient native American leaders similar to ancient Egyptian leaders? leaders of both cultures used to system to control society. religious ideas from which ancient river valley civilization includes ideas that are most like the beliefs of ancient native Americans?