Answer:
The snake moves as seamlessly and effortlessly as the ocean
Explanation:
To me, it seems as the most logical since the lines of the poem are explaining the snakes movements as 'waves' and tainting it with the words 'curving' and 'glides'.
Segregation it is horrible but viewed as good back then
Answer: D. standard English
Explanation:
Standard English is used in formal settings, such as is literature like the excerpt presented in this question, as opposed to non-standard English which is used in informal settings, with family and friends.
Although Standard English began as a regional dialect that emerged in the southeast of England, is now considered the official form to be used in writing, in the education system, court texts, the church, newspapers, and any official writing, and it can be used with different regional accents or without any regional diction.
We know that the excerpt is no using a southern dialect because there are no words like "ain’t" and "y’all", which are common for that dialect.
Answer: C. "For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed."
<em>Option A </em>states that the United States continues to support the work of the United Nations, one of our best tools to maintain peace.
<em>Option B </em>states that both sides need to agree on a system to inspect and control weapons.
<em>Option C </em>argues that the United States needs to gather more weapons and strengthen its military. Kennedy says that only when the military is "sufficient beyond doubt" (definitely more than what is necessary), can they hope for peace.
<em>Option D</em> claims that very few people in history have been privileged enough to be able to fight for freedom.
Answer:
<h3>This advancement would no doubt firstly give many people to live longer on earth.</h3>
Explanation:
- The ability to slow or even stop aging would be the a breakthrough discovery in the history of mankind. Though humans have vast and endless potential, aspirations, and desires, time and age is always limited.
- Therefore, many scientist and other professionals are trying to discover a way to sustain and prolong human lives. If such discovery is made, there would be both pros and cons in this advancement.
- This advancement would no doubt firstly help people to live longer on earth. People would be able to achieve their desires and aspirations without being worried of getting old. People would also be able to spend time more time and years with their loved ones.
- However, this advancement could be dangerous in some ways. The earth will get populated rapidly as people won't die of old age. Thereby disrupting the cycle of life on earth. There will be fight for resources and position on earth. People would hold their positions and resources for a longer period of time denying opportunity to many.
- No, science should not continue to pursue this research because it would disrupt the natural cycle of life on earth.
