Answer:
Radio signal vs. microwave signal.
Explanation:
it's the suitable but again it's a weak answer to compare analog from digital signals
Answer:
Option A i.e., AES is correct.
Explanation:
The user corporation is installing the wireless server and seems to be worried when anyone representing the rival corporation might stands outside that property as well as gather wireless information. He ensured that corporation which WPA2 is safe. However, AES creates WPA2 stronger than WPA.
- Option B is incorrect according to the following scenario because it is the security mechanism used when component through the IEEE 802.11i WLAN standard.
- Option C is incorrect according to the following scenario because it is the protocol initially developed for configure wireless clients to such a dial-in connection device.
- Option D is also incorrect according to the following scenario because it is the terminal access control.
Answer:
????
Explanation:
i dont speak this language
Answer:
The answer to this question is given below in the explanation section.
Explanation:
This question is about what is a good analogy for explaining the actions of a compiler? The correct option is <u> automatic programming of kitchen devices
.</u>
<u>
</u>
a hybrid ability of a car to use multiple energy sources (false)
this analogy is not correctly mapped on the compiler, becuase the compiler can be designed only for one type of language, for example, the program that calculates the average of students number can be easily programmed in C++ and in C#. But you cannot compile the C# program in C++ compiler and vice versa.
a street map of a local subdivision (false)
Because you can design a compiler for a not specific subdivision of programming.
an interpreter who speaks several languages
it is not an analogy, however, an interpreter can handle only one type of language.
an automatic programming of kitchen devices (true)
This is a good analogy of compiler because you give input to the device and that device based on your input gives you back an output. Similarly, you give input to the compiler in form of language syntax, and it automatically give you output based on your input.
I'm unsure in What it is you're asking.
While their rational of a drug user's mind???
this alone makes no direct sense.
also I'm unsure what Computers and Technology have to do with drug user's or their brains.
I can leave you with this a drug addict is and addict hence the name it's an addiction so there is no rationality or distinctiveness in knowing not to use again until one truly wants to get help and change for the better of self.
hope this helps