The third function explains that money is a medium of exchange. It means that it is better to use the money used in the country itself to gain better service because it would provide better protection. Costumers would be more satisfied if the business would accept the money they have and it would be safer and mutually good for both if the customer would transact using the currency country's currency.
Source: https://www.stlouisfed.org/education/economic-lowdown-podcast-series/episode-9-functions-of-money
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Value-based marketing is a shift from product centered to customer centered approach. Customer values and ethics are the primary drivers of this strategy.
When value- based pricing is done, the customer's perception of the value of goods and services is taken into consideration.
This is different from basing price on product cost or historical price.
Answer:
cost of equity = 13%
Explanation:
With the info given, we will use cost of equity formula from Dividend Growth Model. THis is given by:
Where D_1 is the next year dividend or D_1 = D_0(1+g)
P_0 is current stock price
g is the growth rate
Since D_0 (dividend this year) is 4.20 and g = 6.4% or 0.064, we can calculate D_1:
Current share price is 68, so we can now calculate cost of equity:
Hence,
cost of equity = 13%
Answer:
it will be a net loss of 560,000
It is better to produce at a loss of 60,000 than a loss of 620,000
That's because, the Division cover a good portion of their allocate fixed cost.
Explanation:
The fixed expense are allocate cost. Are unavoidable cost It will remain even if the division is dropped.
The sales and variable cost will be zero.
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Continued&Discontinued&Differential\\Sales&1,200,000&0&-1,200,000\\Variable&-640,000&0&640,000\\Allocate cost&-620,000&-620,000&0\\Result&-60,000&-620,000&-560,000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Continued%26Discontinued%26Differential%5C%5CSales%261%2C200%2C000%260%26-1%2C200%2C000%5C%5CVariable%26-640%2C000%260%26640%2C000%5C%5CAllocate%20cost%26-620%2C000%26-620%2C000%260%5C%5CResult%26-60%2C000%26-620%2C000%26-560%2C000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
After posting the values, we calculate the differential income.
In this case it will be a loss for 560,000
Answer:
The correct answer is: Assumption of the risk.
Explanation:
If the risk inherent in a particular action that caused an injury is knowingly and voluntarily assumed, you cannot sue anyone to recover the damages. Suppose, for example, a situation in which he went to a friend's house and was warned about the use of the back door because the floor cover was seriously damaged and would not support a person's weight on it. If you have decided to ignore the warning and use the back door, the doctrine of risk taking will probably prevent the recovery of injuries sustained by a fall on that floor. The court will decide that you "assumed the risk" of such injury.
