The correct answer is B because there are websites that list businesses for sale along with contact information for dealing.
Answer:
to motivate high performance for uninteresting jobs make performance contingent on extrinsic rewards.
Explanation:
Extrinsic rewards means the motivation i.e. controlled and produced via payment, awards and appreciations. In the case when the job is not interesting so the motivation level should be high in this situation and when the job is interesting the motivation level should not high
So as per the given situation, the above statement should be considered as an answer
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
Yes, they are. You can just cut off the end and use it like nothing happened! :)
