The statement is totally false.

because (P and ¬P) is a contradiction.
I'm reading this as

with

.
The value of the integral will be independent of the path if we can find a function

that satisfies the gradient equation above.
You have

Integrate

with respect to

. You get


Differentiate with respect to

. You get
![\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}=\dfrac{\partial}{\partial y}[x^2e^{-y}+g(y)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20f%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20y%7D%3D%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20y%7D%5Bx%5E2e%5E%7B-y%7D%2Bg%28y%29%5D)


Integrate both sides with respect to

to arrive at



So you have

The gradient is continuous for all

, so the fundamental theorem of calculus applies, and so the value of the integral, regardless of the path taken, is
D/13>-3
You have to multiply 13 in both sides to eliminate the Denominator 13 on the left leaving variable D only.
(D/13)(13) > -3(13)
D > -39
so... D. D > -39
Answer:
Only d) is false.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
be the characteristic polynomial of B.
a) We use the rank-nullity theorem. First, note that 0 is an eigenvalue of algebraic multiplicity 1. The null space of B is equal to the eigenspace generated by 0. The dimension of this space is the geometric multiplicity of 0, which can't exceed the algebraic multiplicity. Then Nul(B)≤1. It can't happen that Nul(B)=0, because eigenspaces have positive dimension, therfore Nul(B)=1 and by the rank-nullity theorem, rank(B)=7-nul(B)=6 (B has size 7, see part e)
b) Remember that
. 0 is a root of p, so we have that
.
c) The matrix T must be a nxn matrix so that the product BTB is well defined. Therefore det(T) is defined and by part c) we have that det(BTB)=det(B)det(T)det(B)=0.
d) det(B)=0 by part c) so B is not invertible.
e) The degree of the characteristic polynomial p is equal to the size of the matrix B. Summing the multiplicities of each root, p has degree 7, therefore the size of B is n=7.