Because the framers of the United States Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inventions would encourage the new nation’s economic growth, they gave Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting patent system has served as a model for those in other nations. Recently, however, scholars have questioned whether the American system helped achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American inventors were unable to enforce property rights because judges were “anticipate” and routinely invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This argument is based partly on examination of court decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”) brought suit alleging infringement of their patent rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent of verdicts were decided against the patentee. The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began shifting then.
To learn more about protecting property rights visit here ; brainly.com/question/28388414?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
A: Limited Government
Explanation: “Restraints upon power and authority of government” this means it must be limited because the other options are governments which have endless power
I would say B surveys. Most Criminologist use survey research as a method tool.
Physiology of an individual.
Answer:
This glossary of Course terms, written by Robert Perry, attempts to clarify the special meaning the Course gives familiar words like God, forgiveness, and miracle. Where applicable, it sets the Course’s meaning alongside the conventional definition and/or the traditional Christian usage. This glossary is keyed to the FIP edition of the Course.
