Answer:
wrongful termination laws
Explanation:
Answer:
its c !
Explanation:
the officer will believe you are intoxicated!
Answer: False
Explanation:
Radical criminology simply states that the society is set uo in such a way that the interests of those that are in the ruling class are of paramount concern than having the interest of the entire society and this leads to conflict of interest.
In such case, the capitalist use the powers that they possess in making laws that will be beneficial to the ruling class at the expense of the working class and the society as a whole.
Based on the explanation given, the statement in the question is false.
It depends on how long ago that they made that poor decision. It also depends on if the victim holds a grudge or not, once is likely. So honestly it depends. But, in some States and/or Countries, Schools and Work forbidden Cyberbullying. So in that case, they may or may not accept the fate that the bully has threatened.
Although this may be confusing to take in, I’d say that yes, they should be held accountable, until they learn the fate they have crossed online.
Answer:
Acton, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 1995, ruled (6–3) that an Oregon school board's random drug-testing policy for student athletes was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
