Answer:
The solution is shown in the file attached below
Explanation:
Answer:
According to McNeely, Wagner had to choose between seeking the remaining payment ($250,000 x 1/3) or keeping the timber.
This was a real case: "<em>Glen WAGNER and Bonnie Wagner, Respondents, v. Theodore R. McNEELY, Appellant. (96 CV 0525; CA A100217)
, July 07, 1999</em>"
The Court of Appeals of Oregon ruled that due to usage and customs of the timber industry in Oregon, there was nothing illegal in the plaintiff (Wagner) keeping the timber and seeking the payment. It was a very technical issue regarding two different rules that seem to be contradictory (ORS 72.7090 and ORS 72.7190). The court actually decided not to rule on this issue, so the lower court's decision remained.
I’d probably ignore them.. it is kinda creepy,
Answer:
The risk of a portfolio declines as the number of stocks in the portfolio increases.
Explanation:
In simple words, diversification refers to the benefit of lesser risk that a manager gets by adding negatively or less correlates securities in the portfolio.
However, it is a fact that risk can only be minimized and cannot be eliminated completely. The risk that is specific to the business is called systematic risk and due to its unpredictability it cannot be diversified away.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A.