Answer:
log out and log back in again or log in from the site to the student log in
Explanation:
if that doesn't work then I don't know
In the "Song of Hiawatha" the third and fourth stanza focuses on a magician named Pearl-Feather, Megissogwon, Manito of wealth & Wampum. The poem centers on the actions of this one man because he is the one who murdered Nokomi's father. She sent Hiawatha to revenge her father's murder. The poem was written by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow in 1855. This poem is an epic poem.
It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
I believe the answer is A (:
Answer:
The two beds in the leaves are a symbol of the somebodies absence. As adults, when you look for human faces in clouds, can't find them but see faces everywhere else, hate "formal" gardens because they are too manicured - is this not an example of this?
This story has many lessons about relationships and parental duties. Such small things as respecting each other's space and respecting your children teaches great lessons on treatment with modesty. The story shows how marriage changes relationships in every stage of life.
Explanation:
