Answer: They are both right.
Explanation:
Firms in every market will always maximise profit where their Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost because at this point, resources are being fully utilized. This is therefore no different in a Perfectly competitive market so Skip is correct.
Peggy is also correct however because in a Perfectly Competitive market, the demand curve is perfectly elastic. This creates a situation where the Price, Marginal Revenue and Average Revenue are all the same and represent the demand curve as well.
With the Price being the same as the Marginal Revenue in a Perfectly competitive firm, that means that where the Price equals Marginal Cost is where the Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost as well so indeed perfectly competitive firms maximize profit where price equals marginal cost.
I believe the In a limited liability partnership, all partners are limited partners
Answer:
Dr Interest Receivable $240
Cr Interest Income $240
Explanation:
The reason is that the Techcom company is lender and must account the lending as a loan.
The loan will be paid with the interest at the end of the period. The interest received at the end of December 31 would be the single month loan at the $4800 at the interest rate which is 10 percent here.
The Interest Income = $4800 * (10% interest rate * 2/12) = $240
The interes would be recorded for the two months which is $240 and accounted for as under:
Dr Interest Receivable $240
Cr Interest Income $240
And at the end of January 31, Teller will make the payment which would be accounted for as under:
Dr Cash $5260
Cr Interest Revenue $120
Cr Notes Receivable $4800
Cr Interest Receivable $240
<span>The Robinson–Patman Act is a U.S. federal law that bans chain stores from setting competitive prices on their products. This law was set in place to protect smaller shops and prevent price discrimination. In addition to this benefit, it forbid brokerage allowances as well, among other positive changes with the passing of the law.</span>
