1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GarryVolchara [31]
3 years ago
11

2. Even though it was originally a popular piece of invasion literature, why do you

English
1 answer:
oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago
3 0
The novel is really old and now a days no one is gonna sit and read it
You might be interested in
3) This is a lack of similarity or compatibility between two or more facts or perspectives.
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

discrepancies

Explanation:

The definition for noun discrepancies is  A lack of compatibility or similarity between two or more facts. I might be wrong though

6 0
3 years ago
in paragraph 44 how does the narrator describe their time at Sea and the impact it has on everyone especially the correspondent
joja [24]
You forgot the picture I think -
3 0
3 years ago
What is an assumption historians make when they evaluate a source of information?
den301095 [7]

Answer:

They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.

Explanation:

They know an eyewitness will be free of personal bias. - This is not correct. Eyewitness reports of historical events will most likely be very much based on personal bias. Eyewitness reports will vary according to the cultural background of the person, where they were during events, their emotional state and stance towards the events, their background knowledge, their participation in the events, and many more.

They know a student who did research will be an accurate source. - This is not true. Historians can’t assume the student research will be the accurate source as students are only learning to do proper research and are expected to still make mistakes.

<u>They know an expert will provide the most accurate information. - This is the correct answer. When starting work, historians assume that experts who did research and examinations before them, and who put down information, are giving accurate accounts.</u> For example, if a historian’s work is based on the material artifact, he or she will assume that the archeologist before them made the best possible account into the explanation and background of the artifact.

They know an eyewitness report will always be truthful. - This is not true. As mentioned before, eyewitness reports are highly subjective, and therefore cannot be taken as true scientific findings.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which word best describes the tone of a speech rather than its style?
ankoles [38]
A. Somber

Hope this helps
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An essay type of writing stating the opinions of the publisher is called a(n) ______.
Lena [83]
<span>An essay type of writing stating the opinions of the publisher is called an Editorial.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help!!! Will vote brainliest!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements uses oxymoron?
    7·2 answers
  • The story of the wolf used by chief pontiac is an example of
    11·1 answer
  • Why does atticus not mind that bob ewell spit in his face? what does this reveal about his character?
    14·1 answer
  • Read Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address:
    5·1 answer
  • 2. Which statement best describes the policy of manifest destiny?
    13·2 answers
  • Read the following writing prompt. Think of one way that life in the 1800s was different from the way it is today. Which answer
    6·1 answer
  • What is one reason supporting details are important?
    12·2 answers
  • Are the children changed by what happened to them? How?
    14·1 answer
  • Fill in the blanks.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!