1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
6

PLEASEE HELPPP!!Was appeasement the right policy for England in 1938? Answer in 1 paragraph​

History
1 answer:
antiseptic1488 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: BREAD JK LOL XD

.........................................

..........................................

Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war.

You might be interested in
According to Humanist thinkers, political decisions should be based on____
astraxan [27]

Answer:

rational thought.

Explanation:

According to Humanist thinkers, political decisions should be based on rational thought.  It is because rational thought is based on the facts and with the help of these facts conclusion should be drawn. In politics, political decision should be taken by taking opinions of the members of the party. All the opinions should be considered by reviewing the facts and that opinion is selected for application on which maximum members of the party is agreed.

5 0
3 years ago
In what way was the Sherman Antitrust Act successful?
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

It allowed the government to break up the trust arrangement that the Standard Oil company had.

Explanation:

Approved July 2, 1890, The Sherman Anti-Trust Act was the first Federal act that outlawed monopolistic business practices.

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit trusts. It was named for Senator John Sherman of Ohio, who was a chairman of the Senate finance committee and the Secretary of the Treasury under President Hayes. Several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. The Sherman Antitrust Act was based on the constitutional power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act passed the Senate by a vote of 51–1 on April 8, 1890, and the House by a unanimous vote of 242–0 on June 20, 1890. President Benjamin Harrison signed the bill into law on July 2, 1890.

A trust was an arrangement by which stockholders in several companies transferred their shares to a single set of trustees. In exchange, the stockholders received a certificate entitling them to a specified share of the consolidated earnings of the jointly managed companies. The trusts came to dominate a number of major industries, destroying competition. For example, on January 2, 1882, the Standard Oil Trust was formed. Attorney Samuel Dodd of Standard Oil first had the idea of a trust. A board of trustees was set up, and all the Standard properties were placed in its hands. Every stockholder received 20 trust certificates for each share of Standard Oil stock. All the profits of the component companies were sent to the nine trustees, who determined the dividends. The nine trustees elected the directors and officers of all the component companies. This allowed the Standard Oil to function as a monopoly since the nine trustees ran all the component companies.

The Sherman Act authorized the Federal Government to institute proceedings against trusts in order to dissolve them. Any combination “in the form of trust or otherwise that was in restraint of trade or commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations” was declared illegal. Persons forming such combinations were subject to fines of $5,000 and a year in jail. Individuals and companies suffering losses because of trusts were permitted to sue in Federal court for triple damages. The Sherman Act was designed to restore competition but was loosely worded and failed to define such critical terms as “trust,” “combination,” “conspiracy,” and “monopoly.” Five years later, the Supreme Court dismantled the Sherman Act in United States v. E. C. Knight Company (1895). The Court ruled that the American Sugar Refining Company, one of the other defendants in the case, had not violated the law even though the company controlled about 98 percent of all sugar refining in the United States. The Court opinion reasoned that the company’s control of manufacture did not constitute a control of trade.

The Court’s ruling in E. C. Knight seemed to end any government regulation of trusts. In spite of this, during President Theodore Roosevelt’s “trust busting” campaigns at the turn of the century, the Sherman Act was used with considerable success. In 1904 the Court upheld the government’s suit to dissolve the Northern Securities Company in State of Minnesota v. Northern Securities Company. By 1911, President Taft had used the act against the Standard Oil Company and the American Tobacco Company. In the late 1990s, in another effort to ensure a competitive free market system, the Federal Government used the Sherman Act, then over 100 years old, against the giant Microsoft computer software company.

Resource Used:

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=51

I hope this helps you in any shape or form.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way were Auguste Comte and Immanuel Kant alike?
yKpoI14uk [10]
Auguste Comte and Immanuel Kant were alike in the fact that they both felt like science would improve the world. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the American commander with the battle.
Salsk061 [2.6K]
Camden: Gates
Kings mountain: sevier
Happens: Morgan
Guilfors: Greene
5: George Rogers Clark
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the committee of public safety consider monopoly to be such a serious crime?
Allushta [10]
Because a monopoly would end up making someone monopolizing the whole world to a point where no one can buy a business and would allow them to set their prices as high as they want.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What characterizes an authoritarian government?
    14·1 answer
  • Why didn’t Andrew Jackson ever know his father?
    11·2 answers
  • Richard Nixon best utilized his public speaking skills during which of the following historical events?
    15·1 answer
  • U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren made which of the following statements during his ruling on the case of Brown v. Board o
    14·1 answer
  • The yellow press in the US helped push the country to war by
    8·1 answer
  • What was integral to the spread of Enlightenment from Europe to America?
    12·1 answer
  • Select the two houses of England's Parliament. Senate House of Lords House of Commons House of Representatives Knesset
    9·2 answers
  • The war of 1812 made british north america <br> less british<br> more british?
    12·1 answer
  • Identify the statements that were true of democracy in the eighteenth-century context.
    8·1 answer
  • I need a paragraph teaching me about Mesopotamia and one about Egypt History​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!