The question above does not present the text to which it refers. This makes it impossible for me to show you an answer. However, I will show you how you can find the answer you need.
First, you will need to read the text to which the question refers. This reading will be able to show you how the bank clerk is behaving, his thoughts, and the emotions he is expressing. This will be able to show you the emotional state of that character.
This because:
- Emotional state refers to how the character is mentally.
- This state is revealed through the behavior and the way the character is expressing his feelings.
Thus, if the bank clerk is acting calmly and expressing feelings that reflect this tranquility, it is because he is in a calm emotional state.
Otherwise, if the character is sad, expressing anger, or any other negative feeling, it means he is in an equally negative emotional state. Likewise, if he displays happy behaviors, expresses joy, love, and any happy feelings, it means he is happy and positive.
More information:
brainly.com/question/14990686?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
B does have the most critical tone out of all
Answer:
the aorta at about 1 mile per hour. (sorry if this doesn't help)
Answer: B. God Hermes (in Roman mythology-god Mercury), is the embodiment of the exchange, transfer and transition from one State or position to another.
Hermes gives to gods prayers of people, and to people-blessings of gods. As a conductor of souls, God Hermes embodies the transition from life to death. God of eloquence and treaties, Hermes (Mercury) conveys to others the thoughts of a speaker or messenger. Hermes accompanies the souls of deceased people and is the messenger and the expression of God's will on Earth.
The correct answer is C. Orwell provides a hypothetical situation with someone using unclear language.
Explanation:
The excerpt presented belongs to an essay titled "Politics and the English language" by the writer George Orwell, in this, the author explains in politics it is common to use vague language, euphemisms or similar tot defend actions and regimes that might seem indefensible such as the atom bombs in Japan or the British rule in India, for proving this, Orwell mainly provides a hypothetical example and situation in which a professor defends Russain totalitarianism by using unclear language and words that mask the brutality, for example, the professor would say "While freely conceding that the Soviet regime exhibits certain features which the humanitarian may be inclined to deplore" to describe the killings in this regime.
