I think it’s the last one. good luck!
C. Whom because that’s just what makes more sense than the other options; always try to sound out each of the choices with the following statement and figure out what makes more sense to you :))) you got this
Answer:
The ways they help countribute is 1 big factor on how they could be a significant law in protecting wildlife.
Explanation:
To go against what you've said or done, similar to hypocrisy. Here's the official definition:
To assert to be untrue, often by saying the opposite: synonym: deny.
To assert the opposite of a statement or idea put forward by (someone).
To be contrary to; be inconsistent with.
The answer to the question above is option D: misunderstanding destroys relationships. Basing on the excerpt taken from "<span>fire and ice" by Robert Frost, this clearly shows how misunderstandings can destroy relationships by any means. Fire and Ice here represents the methods of how one relationship can be destroyed. Either way, may it be fire or ice, both has still the potential to destroy something.</span>
